UFO TRUTH MAGAZINE SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: With the increase in online meetings during the last 12 months UFO Truth Magazine is now offering an online six week UFO/UAP Evidential History Course, via Zoom, for those people who want to learn of the real history of this fascinating phenomenon.
Over six consecutive weeks of the course Gary Heseltine, the founder and editor of the magazine will be your tutor as he traces the history of the modern era of the UFO enigma by covering the important events - from major cases, political and scientific studies, beginning with the 1940s through to the present day.
The courses are limited to 12 people at a time and take place in a Zoom room environment and utilize the shared screen facility to impart information, graphics and video. The course is in English only. As this is the first course the Special Introductory price is just £75 (6 x 75 minutes classes which is just £12.50 an hour) and at the end you will receive a Certificate of Completion signed by the founder and editor of UFO Truth Magazine.
The course will comprise of six weekly modules, each 75 minutes
in duration, with the first three courses commencing Monday 5th April 2021 for six consecutive weeks (Monday recurring). Times available:
Course A: 1030-1145 hours
Course B: 1300-1415 hours
Course C: 2000-2115 hours
Module One: 1942-1949: Foo Fighters, green fireballs, the Kenneth Arnold sighting, Roswell, Project Sign, the Estimate of the Situation and the birth of the modern era of UFOs. Q & A.
Module Two: 1950-59: Project Grudge, Project Magnet, the Robertson Panel, Project Blue Book and the Report on Unidentified Flying Objects. Q & A.
Module Three: 1960-1969: Significant cases and studies, The Condon Report. Q & A.
Module Four: 1970-1999: Significant cases including the Tehran Incident, Oscar Santa Maria, the Japan Airlines encounter, Operation Prato and the Rendlesham Forest incident. Q & A.
Module Five: 2000-2019: USS Nimitz incident, TTSA FLIR videos, the Washington Citizens Hearings, major cases and developments from around the world. Q & A.
Module Six: 2020-Present Day: The creation of the US Navy Task Force, the Task Force report to the US Senate and its potential implications for society. Q & A.
What’s behind unidentified aerial phenomena observed by military officials? Are we alone in the universe? Nextgov asks some experts.
It can be difficult to discuss unidentified flying objects, especially for a government. While some may dismiss reports as fantasy, others argue that whatever is going on could be a threat to national security.
“In the past, pilots were afraid to report these strange things happening—for fear it would affect their advancement in the officer corps,” former Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., told Nextgov in this episode of Critical Update. While he was in Congress, Reid helped secure funding for the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, a quiet, UFO-studying effort that became public in late 2017. That group is now considered a precursor to the Pentagon’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.
“The one thing that we established is that not a dozen people have seen these occurrences. Not 100 of them. Thousands of people have seen them,” Reid explained. People have long been intrigued by the thought of “little green men,” and, according to the former Senate Majority Leader, it’s what people he randomly encounters often ask him about.
Today, little is known about the modern UAP Task Force, a secretive unit investigating reports of what appear to be unexplainable aircraft, zipping across American skies. But soon, some federal personnel will have to provide certain members of Congress with information about what the government does know about UFOs—and who might be behind them.
Regardless of whether these sightings originate from another planet or an earthbound adversary, sophisticated technologies do exist to study hard-to-decipher, seemingly alien-related observations.
Dr. Joseph Pesce, an astrophysicist and program director in the National Science Foundation’s division of astronomical sciences provided a brief glimpse into some of the different tools humans could tap to “understand the universe around us and our part in it.” Pesce pondered the likelihood of multiple out-of-this-world possibilities, including the existence of life in outer space and UFOs’ potential to make it to Earth.
“Space travel is difficult—for many reasons,” he said. Still, Pesce later added, “I’m not arrogant enough to think that we know everything about nature and the universe, and the laws of nature.”
Listen below in your browser or download this episode from the Apple Store, Google Play or your favorite podcast platform.
A bewildered pensioner who enjoys looking at the night sky was left dumbfounded after claiming he spotted a UFO hovering above his house.
Ian Gibbons, from Colne, said he was looking through his patio window a couple of weeks ago, at around 6.30pm, when he saw the UFO appear from what he described as 'a portal'.
Mr Gibbons, 72, said it was 'just like something out of a sci-fi movie', but before he could do anything it vanished.
He said: "On a good night Mars and Venus can usually be seen from where I live, we've got great views out over the countryside, and on this particular night the sky was clear and Venus had just appeared.
"I'm not into stargazing in a big way, I just like to look out of the window and admire the sky, so I went to the patio and had a look out and all of a sudden this UFO came out of a portal - it was red and orange and circular.
"I grabbed my binoculars and got a good view of it while it hovered for a few seconds, but in the wink of an eye it shot up into the sky and then sped off towards Skipton."
Mr Gibbons said he'd never seen anything like it before in his life, and he hasn't seen anything similar since.
He added: "I do believe someone over in Barnoldswick saw it as well. It was on February 22.
"It definitely wasn't a plane or someone shining a light - I had a fantastic view of it, it was like something out of a sci-fi movie."
The last meteor shower experienced in the UK was on February 28, six days after Mr Gibbons claimed he saw a UFO.
It is possible that what Mr Gibbons saw was a drone, but that cannot be confirmed.
Ancient astronaut theories have been popular for some time, but does that mean they're true?
Petroglyphs from Val Camonica, Italy
By Matthew S. Williams
In 1966, famed science communicator Carl Sagan and his Soviet colleague Iosif Shklovsky released a book titled Intelligent Life in the Universe. This was an English-language version of an earlier work by Shklovksy (Universe, Life, Intelligence) that was published in 1962 in the USSR. The book remains one of the most highly-influential books on the subject of extraterrestrial intelligence and the search for its existence.
In Chapter Thirty-Three, "Possible Consequences of Direct Contact," they claim that scientists should take the possibility that extraterrestrials have visited Earth in the past seriously. They further suggested that evidence of past contact could be preserved in the folklore and mythological traditions of various cultures.
As an example, Sagan and Shklovsky point to an account of the contact made between the Tlingit people of the Pacific Northwest and the La Perouse French expedition in 1786. This event was recorded a century later by anthropologist G.T. Emmons during one of his many visits to the area.
While it was told in the context of Tlingit mythology and contained supernatural elements (for example, the sailing ships were described as immense black birds with white wings), the descriptions left no doubt that it was a faithful retelling of an actual event. Sagan and Shlovksy wrote that the same could be true of extraterrestrials visiting Earth in the past:
"The encounter between La Perouse and the Tlingit suggests that under certain circumstances, a brief contact with an alien civilization will be recorded in a reconstructible manner. The reconstruction will be aided if (1) the account is committed to written record soon after the event; (2) a major change is effected in the contacted society by the encounter; and (3) no attempt is made by the contacting civilization to disguise its exogenous nature."
In addition, Shklovskii and Sagan cited the Sumerian legend of Oannes (Uanna to the Akkadians), ancient fish-like beings that we said to have taught agriculture, mathematics, and the arts to early humanity. Shklovskii and Sagan pointed to this as a possible instance of paleo-contact because of the level of consistency and detail involved.
Of course, Sagan and Shklovsky emphasized the need for skepticism and stated that these ideas were speculative and unproven. This was in large part because of some rather wild and unscientific theories that had become popular by the late 1970s. These would come to be known as "Ancient Astronaut" theories, which are no less popular today!
Nazca Lines in Peru, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Pyramids, Paleo-Contact, and Alien DNA
To break it down, the Ancient Astronauts (AA) theory is that extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) has visited Earth in the past and made contact with ancient humans (aka. "paleo-contact"). In some cases, proponents maintain that contact played a role in our technological, cultural, or spiritual evolution (what might be known as the "Culturalist" school of thought).
Some "Culturists" argue that aliens were responsible for (or assisted in) the construction of ancient monuments and structures. In some cases, it is argued that these monuments paid homage to alien species, whom ancient people viewed as gods. This version of the AA hypothesis has become rather popular, as illustrated by the History Channel series Ancient Aliens.
Meanwhile, other proponents of the AA theory insist that humans are actually descendants (or creations) of aliens and that they altered the DNA of ancient primates in order to foster intelligence in hominids (what could be called "Geneticists").
People who subscribed to this school of thought argue that modern humans are the result of genetic alteration by a more advanced species. Variations of this argument include claims that aliens contributed their own genetic material to fast-track human evolution or that humans are the descendants of alien colonists.
Origin and Influence
While examples of the AA theory and paleo-contact can be found in science fiction works as early as the late 19th century, it was not until the mid-20th century that it began to be argued as an actual theory. In 1954, British pseudohistorian Harold T. Wilkins proposed that UFO abductions have occurred since ancient times.
In 1960, Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier (two French journalists and conspiracy theorists) released The Morning of the Magicians, which merged elements of pseudohistory and occultism with theories about UFO, conspiracies, and ancient astronauts.
French science-fiction author Robert Charroux also wrote about ancient astronauts in his 1963 book, One Hundred Thousand Years of Man's Unknown History, along with theories of lost continents (Atlantis, Mu, Hyperborea), UFOs, and apocalyptic prophecies.
But it was Erich von Däniken, the well-known Swiss author and fraudster, who popularized the AA theory (as it is commonly known today) with his 1968 book Chariot of the Gods?. In this and subsequent books, von Däniken established arguments cited by AA theorists to this day.
Among the many arguments made by von Däniken was that extraterrestrials were responsible for some of the greatest technological innovations in the ancient world and that the evidence for this can be found in ancient structures and artifacts.
In particular, von Däniken claimed that these structures were built using methods and technology which could not have been available to the indigenous culture at the time. Examples include the pyramids of Giza, Stonehenge, Pumapunku, the Moai of Rapa Nui, the Nazca lines of Peru, and the "Baghdad batteries."
Däniken further argued that ancient artwork and iconography depict spacecraft, extraterrestrials, and advanced technology. These include the Japanese Dogū figurines that he claimed resembled astronauts, the "helicopter hieroglyphs" in the Egyptian temple of Seti at Abydos. The fact that disparate cultures had common elements in their artwork was also cited as evidence.
Last, but not least, he claimed that many ancient religions (Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Hinduism, etc.) were inspired by paleo-contact. Däniken referred specifically to instances where ancient people refer to "chariots in the sky," and other divine revelations were actually instances where humans communicated with aliens.
Despite being panned by academics everywhere, von Däniken's book would prove to be influential and would inspire a number of similar books that were published throughout the 1970s. These included Zecharia Sitchin's The 12th Planet (1976), in which he argued that the ancient Sumerians were descended from aliens from a planet called Niburu.
Sitchin claimed that this planet orbits the Sun at a great distance and takes 3,600 years to complete a single orbital cycle. He based this on his personal interpretations of Sumerian and Middle Eastern texts, which he claims mention a “12th planet” associated with the Babylonian god Marduk (who was later astrologically associated with Jupiter).
Also released in 1976 was Robert K. G. Temple’s The Sirius Mystery, which argued that the oral traditions of the Dogon people of West Africa include a description of paleo-contact. According to Temple, contact took place between the locals and an advanced species from Sirius roughly 5000 years ago.
Dogon also credited this alien species with inspiring the mythological traditions of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and other cultures. These theories remained popular with counter-cultural groups during the 1970s and were often embraced as part of new-age spiritualism and fascination with ancient cultures.
By the early 1980s, interest in the AA theory began to wane, but in recent decades, it has experienced something of a renaissance. Thanks to the proliferation of conspiracy-theory websites, non-academic publications, and television series' featuring these theories, it has become popular again since the late 1990s.
Evidence? What Evidence?
Proponents of AA theory rely on a combination of oral traditions, literary references, bits of archaeology, cultural similarities, and gaps in historical/archaeological records to support their arguments. For example, von Däniken's biggest claim is that ancient cultures did not have the sophisticated technology needed to create structures and artifacts.
Another line of "evidence" are ancient texts that make reference to the gods, which von Däniken claims were actually advanced extraterrestrials. In Chariot of the Gods?, he cites passages from the Sanskrit epic Ramayana, where the gods travel to and fro on flying chariots called "Vimana" (which he claimed was a reference to spacecraft).
Sitchin's theories, meanwhile, are based entirely on his reading of the Babylonian creation myth, Enûma Eliš. Specifically, he claims that the Annunaki (the most powerful and important gods in the Babylonian pantheon) were a technologically advanced race of humanoids from the planet Niburu.
According to Sitchin, Niburu is an undiscovered planet beyond Neptune that has a highly elliptical orbit, causing it to enter the Solar System once every 3,600 years. Niburu is the "12th planet" in Sumerian mythology, Sitchin argued, because they counted the Sun and Moon as planets (this list also included Pluto).
Sitchin further claimed that Niburu (the name was later changed to Marduk, he claims) collided with another planet located between Mars and Jupiter (aka. the Asteroid Belt). This planet was known as Tiamat (a goddess in the creation myth that was overthrown by Marduk), the debris of which formed planet Earth.
He claims that they first arrived on Earth probably 450,000 years ago, looking for minerals (especially gold) which they grew tired of mining. Hence, they created a slave race (humans) by combining their DNA with that of Homo Erectus. Sitchin further claimed that these accounts coincide with biblical texts.
According to Temple, there are similarities between the mythological traditions of the ancient Sumerians, Egyptians, Greeks, and those of the Dogon people in West Africa. These include shared myths, symbols, and ideas, as well as the advanced astronomical knowledge, which he claims is evidence of paleo-contact.
Proponents like Giorgio Tsoukalos, a former sports commentator and current consulting producer on Ancient Aliens, even venture that extraterrestrials were responsible for causing the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (which killed the dinosaurs) as part of an attempt at directing evolution.
Science Fact vs. Fiction
If this is starting to sound familiar, it's probably because the idea is quite popular in science fiction circles. The classic example (and gold standard) was the 1968 film 2001: A Space Odyssey, a film that depicts a highly-advanced ETI coming to Earth in the past and our attempts to meet up with them in the near future.
This film was the work of esteemed writer/director Stanley Kubrik and famed science communicator Arthur C. Clarke. It was also inspired by two short stories written by Clarke: "Encounter in the Dawn" (1953) and "The Sentinel" (1951).
These stories were the basis for Parts I and II of the film. The former part takes place millions of years ago, where extraterrestrials visit Earth at a key point in humanity's evolution. The latter part occurs around the turn of the century, when humanity uncovers an alien artifact on the surface of the Moon.
Other examples include an episode of Star Trek: TNG (S6E20, titled "The Chase"). In this episode, the crew discovers that an ancient predecessor race was responsible for the creation of life in their quadrant (hence why just about every species in the galaxy are humanoids!)
Fans of Stargate (the 1994 movie and the series' that followed) ought to instantly recognize how this franchise was built on a foundation of AA theory. The story centers on how paleo-contact between early humans and an ancient species (the Goa'uld) led to the birth of Egyptian civilization, and how their gods were actually the Goa'uld themselves.
A more recent example is Prometheus, the 2012 film by Ridley Scott that was clearly inspired by 2001: A Space Odyssey. This film shows how an ancient race of "Engineers" (aka. the "Engineers" or "Space Jockeys" from Alien) was responsible for creating humanity, as well as the xenomorph that is the franchise's main antagonist.
The idea remains popular for obvious reasons. It's a fascinating concept that touches on multiple scientific theories and pursuits, not the least of which is panspermia, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI), the Fermi Paradox, and abiogenesis (the origins of life).
But in the hands of people like Däniken and other AA theorists, it quickly became recognized as something somewhere between new-age spiritualism and pseudoscience. As expected, the reception Däniken's book got from the academic community was resoundingly negative.
Pseudoscience or Veiled Racism?
Whether it was archaeologists, paleontologists, anthropologists, astronomers, SETI-researchers, geneticists, biologists (the list goes on), there was no shortage of lining up to offer harsh critiques about his theories, his research methodology, and his conclusions.
Sagan and Shklovksii were two such individuals. In fact, Sagan wrote in his 1979 book Broca's Brain that he and Shklovskii regretted whatever role they played in the 1970s ancient astronaut craze. Sagan specifically referred to von Däniken "and other uncritical writers" who offered their theories up as unsubstantiated proof rather than food for thought.
On its face, AA theories are easy enough to debunk because of their lack of evidence, sloppy research, confirmation bias, falsifiable premises, and disprovable claims. Chief among these is the claim that ancient peoples were not capable of creating ancient monuments and megalithic structures.
Archaeologists have challenged this by demonstrating with evidence the methods used by the Egyptians, Incas, Mesoamericans, Mesopotamians, and other cultures. In all cases, it was a simple matter of having the right materials, basic tools, an understanding of engineering and geometry, and thousands of laborers - all of which these empires possessed in abundance!
In addition, academics have debunked AA claims that megalithic structures appeared suddenly by pointing to the archaeological record (or even historical records). For example, in Peru, archaeologists discovered evidence of rope-and-lever systems that were used by the Inca to transport stones to build the fortress of Sacsayhuamán north of their ancient capital of Cusco.
Similarly, the Incan Nazca Lines were made in a way that was similar to how other geoglyphs around the world were, by simply removing the darker top layer of the ground to expose brighter patches beneath. They were also easy enough to plot out using simple measurements and a hillside viewing - i.e., they did NOT require aircraft to appreciate!
In the case of the Egyptian pyramids, archaeologists have been able to construct a detailed account of how (and even why) they were built. This includes locating the quarries where the stone came from, what tools were used, what engineering techniques were involved, and even written records that describe their purpose and how the labor was organized.
In short, the "gaps" in the record that AA theorists refer to are actually gaps in their own knowledge. This is a classic example of the appeal to ignorance fallacy, where a supposed lack of evidence to the contrary is considered proof.
Another common logical fallacy that comes up in AA theory is the analogy known as “Russell’s teapot.” Essentially, many AA theorists have argued that their ideas cannot be disproven whenever they are criticized for not meeting the burden of proof.
Yet another poignant criticism of AA theories is the way they resemble racist and ethnocentric theories regarding cultural sites around the world. Between the 16th and 19th centuries, European explorers observed a number of megalithic structures in Africa, Asia, and the Americas for the first time and misattributed their origins.
In short, they often concluded that the local population was not capable of creating such feats of construction and engineering. A classic example of this is Angkor Wat, a series of ancient structures in modern-day Cambodia that covers an area that measures about 155 mi2 (400 km2).
These ruins were once the capital of the Khmer Empire (ca. 9th to the 15th century) that stretched across much of South-East Asia. However, when French naturalist Henri Mouhot first observed the temples in 1860, he theorized that it must have been built by the ancient Romans or Alexander the Great, because he assumed the indigenous Khmer were incapable.
Similarly, you have the large earthen mounds at Cahokia, Illinois (the largest of which is known as Monks Mound), which were built in 1050 CE by the Mississippian culture. Before the city declined by 1400 CE, it supported a population of 25,000 to 50,000 people who cultivated maize, hunted with fine arrow points, and created pottery, shell jewelry, and flint clay figurines.
But after white missionaries and settlers began moving to the area by the 17th century and after, they denied that local people were responsible. Some went so far as to claim that it was travelers from Egypt or elsewhere that were responsible. Similar claims have been made about the stepped pyramids of Mesoamerica, such as the Chichen Itza, Teotihuacan, and others.
The stepped pyramid of the Sun in Teotihuacan
Once again, the notion that traveling Egyptians design or built these structures (rather than the Mayans, the Toltecs, Aztecs, and other local peoples) remains a popular one even to this day. This in spite of the fact that archeologists have thoroughly debunked them using archaeological evidence, carbon dating, and other methods.
While carbon dating has shown that the Egyptian and American pyramids were built thousands of years apart, archaeological evidence shows that different methods were used to build them. It's also been demonstrated that they served different purposes, where the great Pyramids were tombs for the pharaohs while Mesoamerican stepped pyramids were associated with religious rites.
On top of all that, with the exception of the Viking expeditions, no evidence exists of trans-Atlantic contact prior to the "Columbian Era" (late 15th/early 16th centuries). At their core, AA theories are all come down to the Eurocentric belief that only cultures from the Mediterranean or West Asia (where modern western history traces its roots) were capable of megalithic engineering.
In this respect, AA theories are much the same, except that aliens have become a substitute for European or Mediterranean civilizations! At the end of the day, it is just assumed (without evidence) that indigenous human beings weren't up to the task.
Perhaps another reason why AA theories remain popular is that they appeal to a sense of wish-fulfillment. After all, the idea that advanced extraterrestrial civilizations exist out there and have visited Earth before is intriguing! So maybe it's not all racism and conspiracy-theories. That does not change the fact that these beliefs are built on the rejection of the scientific method.
Worse than that, it denigrates our own ancestors by denying their accomplishments. On its own, believing that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the Universe sounds like a positive thing. But not when it causes us to lose sight of our fellow humans and the undeniable spark of creativity we all possess.
Sometimes, we need to let that spark grow into a full-fledged fire, then express it through massive works of art, architecture, and engineering. As for the engineering, construction, and technical details, we'll figure that out with the tools and knowledge we currently have.
If intelligent aliens visit the Earth, it would be one of the most profound events in human history.
Surveys show that nearly half of Americans believe that aliens have visited the Earth, either in the ancient past or recently. That percentage has been increasing. Belief in alien visitation is greater than belief that Bigfoot is a real creature, but less than belief that places can be haunted by spirits.
Scientists dismiss these beliefs as not representing real physical phenomena. They don't deny the existence of intelligent aliens. But they set a high bar for proof that we've been visited by creatures from another star system. As Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
I'm a professor of astronomy who has written extensively on the search for life in the universe. I also teach a free online class on astrobiology. Full disclosure: I have not personally seen a UFO.
Unidentified flying objects
UFO means unidentified flying object. Nothing more, nothing less.
There's a long history of UFO sightings. Air Force studies of UFOs have been going on since the 1940s. In the United States, "ground zero" for UFOs occurred in 1947 in Roswell, New Mexico. The fact that the Roswell incident was soon explained as the crash landing of a military high-altitude balloon didn't stem a tide of new sightings. The majority of UFOs appear to people in the United States. It's curious that Asia and Africa have so few sightings despite their large populations, and even more surprising that the sightings stop at the Canadian and Mexican borders.
Most UFOs have mundane explanations. Over half can be attributed to meteors, fireballs and the planet Venus. Such bright objects are familiar to astronomers but are often not recognized by members of the public. Reports of visits from UFOs inexplicably peaked about six years ago.
Many people who say they have seen UFOs are either dog walkers or smokers. Why? Because they're outside the most. Sightings concentrate in evening hours, particularly on Fridays, when many people are relaxing with one or more drinks.
A few people, like former NASA employee James Oberg, have the fortitude to track down and find conventional explanations for decades of UFO sightings. Most astronomers find the hypothesis of alien visits implausible, so they concentrate their energy on the exciting scientific search for life beyond the Earth.
Are we alone?
While UFOs continue to swirl in the popular culture, scientists are trying to answer the big question that is raised by UFOs: Are we alone?
Astronomers have discovered over 4,000 exoplanets, or planets orbiting other stars, a number that doubles every two years. Some of these exoplanets are considered habitable, since they are close to the Earth's mass and at the right distance from their stars to have water on their surfaces. The nearest of these habitable planets are less than 20 light years away, in our cosmic "back yard." Extrapolating from these results leads to a projection of 300 million habitable worlds in our galaxy. Each of these Earth-like planets is a potential biological experiment, and there have been billions of years since they formed for life to develop and for intelligence and technology to emerge.
Astronomers are very confident there is life beyond the Earth. As astronomer and ace exoplanet-hunter Geoff Marcy, puts it, "The universe is apparently bulging at the seams with the ingredients of biology." There are many steps in the progression from Earths with suitable conditions for life to intelligent aliens hopping from star to star. Astronomers use the Drake Equation to estimate the number of technological alien civilizations in our galaxy. There are many uncertainties in the Drake Equation, but interpreting it in the light of recent exoplanet discoveries makes it very unlikely that we are the only, or the first, advanced civilization.
This confidence has fueled an active search for intelligent life, which has been unsuccessful so far. So researchers have recast the question "Are we alone?" to "Where are they?"
The absence of evidence for intelligent aliens is called the Fermi Paradox. Even if intelligent aliens do exist, there are a number of reasons why we might not have found them and they might not have found us. Scientists do not discount the idea of aliens. But they aren't convinced by the evidence to date because it is unreliable, or because there are so many other more mundane explanations.
Modern myth and religion
UFOs are part of the landscape of conspiracy theories, including accounts of abduction by aliens and crop circles created by aliens. I remain skeptical that intelligent beings with vastly superior technology would travel trillion of miles just to press down our wheat.
It's useful to consider UFOs as a cultural phenomenon. Diana Pasulka, a professor at the University of North Carolina, notes that myths and religions are both means for dealing with unimaginable experiences. To my mind, UFOs have become a kind of new American religion.
So no, I don't think belief in UFOs is crazy, because some flying objects are unidentified, and the existence of intelligent aliens is scientifically plausible.
But a study of young adults did find that UFO belief is associated with schizotypal personality, a tendency toward social anxiety, paranoid ideas and transient psychosis. If you believe in UFOs, you might look at what other unconventional beliefs you have.
I'm not signing on to the UFO "religion," so call me an agnostic. I recall the aphorism popularized by Carl Sagan, "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
Two classified reports from the Pentagon's task force used to "detect, analyze and catalog" UFOs have been leaked, both of which include photos of unidentified objects.
Defense news website TheDebrief.org has published the reports, including an Oct. 16, 2019, email exchange between former Vice Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Robert Burke and current Vice Chief of Staff for the Air Force Gen. Stephen Wilson. This exchange was obtained by a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from The Debrief.
“Recommend you take the brief I just received from our Director of Naval Intelligence VADM Matt Kohler, on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP),” Burke told Wilson in the email. Burke added that "SECNAV will get the same brief tomorrow at 1000," likely referring to then-Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer.
The leaked photo, taken off the East Coast of the U.S. by a "pilot’s personal cell phone," was a part of the 2018 position report, one source told the news outlet. This report discussed what the unidentified silver “cube-shaped” object could be, with a list of possible explanations discussed, including the fact it could be “alien” or “non-human” technology.
The 2020 photo, which has been leaked but is not widely available yet, is described as a triangle with white lights in each corner. This may be the more interesting photo, Nick Pope, a former employee and UFO investigator for Britain's Ministry of Defense, told Fox News.
"I'm more interested in the fact that this first photo has been leaked, and in the related leaking of information about the Pentagon's Unidentified Aerial Task Force, where serving intelligence community personnel have shared insights from two intelligence position reports," Pope said via email. "With my own defense background in this subject, three things stand out. Firstly, the description by one insider of the reports as 'shocking' — a word that begs the question what about UAP do these people find shocking. Secondly, the fact that the intelligence reports seem to have been given a surprisingly wide distribution in various intelligence agencies, and thirdly, the fact that the extraterrestrial hypothesis seems genuinely not to have been taken off the table."
Pope added he expects further leaks, noting he believes there is "a faction within government clearly wants this information to be released to the public."
The two position reports from 2018 and 2020 were widely circulated among the defense community, The Debrief added, citing interviews with multiple sources.
The Pentagon has not yet responded to a request for comment from Fox News.
In August, the Pentagon created a task force to investigate UFOs, or UAPs, following several unexplained incidents that have been observed by the U.S. military.
The creation of the task force follows inquiries from lawmakers about the subject. In June, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, acting chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, instructed the director of national intelligence, the secretary of defense and other agency heads to compile data on “unidentified aerial phenomenon."
"The Committee remains concerned that there is no unified, comprehensive process within the federal government for collecting and analyzing intelligence on unidentified aerial phenomena, despite the potential threat,” lawmakers wrote in a report.
In July, the New York Times reported that a small group of government officials, including Reid, and scientists believe objects of “undetermined origin” have crashed to Earth and been retrieved. The publication cited Eric W. Davis, an astrophysicist who worked as a subcontractor and a consultant for the Pentagon UFO program. Davis, who now works for defense contractor Aerospace Corporation, said he gave briefings on the recovery of unexplained objects to staff members of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee, on Oct. 21 and Oct. 23, 2019.
In April, the Pentagon officially released videos of "unidentified aerial phenomena," known as "FLIR1,” “Gimbal” and “GoFast,” previously captured by Navy aircraft. The footage had circulated in the public for years. They were originally released to the New York Times and to The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, headed by Blink-182 co-founder Tom DeLonge.
After the videos were released publicly, DeLonge said "UFOs are real" in a since-deleted tweet.
The story of the Three Wise Men had more to it than we thought, a UFO expert has claimed (Image: Getty Images)
By Charlie Lawrence Jones and Seamus Duff
UFO expert Richard Lawrence has made the sensationaly suggestion that everything the Bible has taught about the birth of Christ is inaccurate – and that even the true date of Christmas is wrong.
A UFO believer has challenged the central pillar of the Christian faith by bizarrely declaring that the son of God was an alien and the story of the birth of Christ involved an alien spaceship.
Richard Lawrence is the author of 11 books about aliens and is considered a "Guru of UFOs" by contemporaries in his field.
He is the Executive Secretary of The Aetherius Society – a relatively new religious movement founded by late British spiritualist George King in the 1950s which aims to spread "teaching on extraterrestrial intelligences".
Mr Lawrence claims that extraterrestrial life goes to the very core of the Christian faith – suggesting the star described in the nativity story hovering above Bethlehem was in fact a spaceship and that Christ himself came from outer space.
UFO expert Richard Lawrence has claimed Jesus himself was an 'alien' from outer space (Image: MyLondon)
In an eyebrow-raising interview with My London, Mr Lawrence said of Jesus: “I wouldn’t call him an alien, I’d call him a great cosmic intelligence. But yes alien if you’d like."
He added: “I believe he came from Venus.”
Mr Lawrence and The Aetherius Society claim that Jesus, Buddha, Gandhi and Sophocles were all extraterrestrial beings sent to Earth to help humanity over the course of history.
The London-based UFO expert even went as far as to claim the Bible itself backs up his wild theory.
He said: “Based on the Bible, the Star of Bethlehem was witnessed by three wise men whom one would take to be very credible witnesses”
“It guided them to a specific place. It couldn’t have been a star, they don’t move.
Mr Lawrence – whose published books include UFOs and the Extraterrestrial Message, and Unlock Your Psychic Powers – also says Christmas should be marked in March, not December 25.
He claims Aetherius Society founder George King “was told” this was the case, while the fact that shepherds are referenced in the bible as “watching their flocks by night couldn’t have been doing that on December 25. It would be a spring thing.”
Because 2020 isn’t strange or bad enough as it is, here’s something that should make it twice so: aliens exist and have already made contact. In fact, they’re on Earth as we speak but have asked that their presence is not made public.
A new interview by Professor Haim Eshed is making the rounds with ufologists and conspiracy theorists worldwide, since he claims to be blowing off the lid on a long-kept secret. His credentials and accumulated experience should add weight to his argument because he is none other than the former head of Israel’s security space program, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics, a vet pilot and flight instructor.
According to Jewish Press, Prof. Eshed’s recent comments stem from an interview with 7 Days, the largest circulation for-pay publication in Israel. They all revolve around the idea that aliens have been living on Earth for quite some time, but no one knows about it because the aliens themselves have asked that they be kept a secret until humanity is ready.
“The UFOs have asked not to publish that they are here, humanity is not ready yet. Trump was on the verge of revealing, but the aliens in the Galactic Federation are saying: Wait, let people calm down first. They don’t want to start mass hysteria. They want to first make us sane and understanding,” Prof. Eshed said.
Until people are ready for the aliens, the aliens and select governments have been working together, studying each other.
“They have been waiting for humanity to evolve and reach a stage where we will generally understand what space and spaceships are," the Professor continues. "There’s an agreement between the U.S. government and the aliens. They signed a contract with us to do experiments here. They, too, are researching and trying to understand the whole fabric of the universe, and they want us as helpers. There’s an underground base in the depths of Mars, where their representatives are, and also our American astronauts.”
Prof. Eshed admits that saying these things will undoubtedly make some question his sanity and stresses that he would have been labeled a head-case if he’d gone on the record with them five years ago. But the times are changing, and people are starting to warm up to the idea of UFOs, which is why he’s speaking out now, he says. “I have nothing to lose,” he adds as the final argument.
Whether you choose to believe Prof. Eshed or not, do note that this narrative, with the aliens living among us with approval from the U.S. government, isn’t a new one. It’s actually been around for years, and claims that certain authorities and the aliens have struck an understanding to use this time to study each other. The secret location on Mars isn’t new, either.
How archetypal dreams, visions, and art respond to a collective crisis.
One of the last books he ever wrote, C.G. Jung’s Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Skies (1957) shows how psychology can shed new light on social anxieties and cultural conflicts. This slender text offers Jung’s perspective on the controversial phenomenon of “unidentified flying objects” (UFOs). Writing at a time when UFO sightings were a public craze, Jung saw an opportunity for psychology to make a valuable contribution to collective understanding and self-reflection. The resulting book remains an excellent model for the psychological interpretation of culture, with potentially helpful implications for our troubled times today.
Jung examined several kinds of texts with the UFO theme: dreams, art from both old and new sources, waking visions, and science fiction, along with media stories and governmental reports. This itself is interesting, as it shows how Jung treated all these different kinds of texts as arenas in which symbols from the collective unconscious (“archetypes”) can emerge. When treating an individual patient, Jung looked for the emergence of special symbols or archetypes that respond directly to the patient’s waking life problems. With the UFO phenomenon, he expanded this approach to the whole of Western society. Why are so many people dreaming, thinking, and envisioning UFOs at this particular moment? What is happening in society right now that elicits this kind of collective visionary experience?
Here as in many of his later writings, Jung highlighted the psychological strains of living during the height of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. The division of the world into two hostile, nuclear-armed camps, separated by an “Iron Curtain,” suggested that global humanity was in a gravely unhealthy condition. Jung also emphasized here as elsewhere how the modern world can threaten individuality with mass movements, both politically (communism) and economically (consumer capitalism). People everywhere were in danger of being subsumed into mindless, undifferentiated groups where true psychological development was impossible.
The sudden surge of UFO sightings at this specific moment in history made sense, Jung said, as a response to these acute social anxieties. With the conscious mind in such an embattled condition, the collective unconscious provided what Jung called a compensatory or balancing archetypal symbol: the mandala, an image of wholeness and integration. Mandala symbols are best known from Buddhism, Hinduism, and other Asian religions, but in their archetypal essence they appear in all cultures, usually as round figures with a variety of geometric, chromatic, and symbolic complexities. Jung said that UFOs, whatever their reality as visitors from alien planets, have the psychological meaning of mandalas, projected into the sky above us, giving us a vision of transcendent union and wholeness. The integration we have failed to achieve in this world is reflected back to us as a living potential arriving from the greater realm of the cosmos (itself a symbol of the collective unconscious). Because people of our time are struggling in this essential psychological task of becoming an integrated, fully actualized individual (the process of “individuation”), the archetype of wholeness cannot be directly recognized in its traditional forms. Thus, it “is forced to manifest itself indirectly in the form of spontaneous projections. The projected image then appears as an ostensibly physical fact independent of the individual psyche and its nature. In other words, the rounded wholeness of the mandala becomes a space ship controlled by an intelligent being.”
Thinking of Jung’s book and its methods as applied to our world today, we can ask the following questions: What is the great anxiety of our age? What is the greatest threat to collective health and well-being? What are the compensating dreams and visions pointing us beyond our current problems?
Since Jung’s time, the Cold War has ended, and Westerners have little to fear from global communism. The threat of civilization-ending nuclear war remains, but it no longer worries people the way it did some decades ago. Instead, a multitude of other apocalyptic scenarios haunt people’s waking hours. These include environmental catastrophe, civil war, economic collapse, pharmacological mind-control, robotic takeover, and political tyranny under an evil dictatorship (e.g. by fascists, socialists, racists, theocrats, and/or neoliberals), not to mention a global pandemic. We have reached Boschian extremes in our capacity to conjure vividly variegated scenarios of doom and ruin.
Following the logic of Jung’s method, and given our present context, perhaps we should be on the lookout for dreams, visions, and works of art that provide a creative response from the unconscious depths to these overwhelming apocalyptic horrors.
For instance, we might expect the compensatory emergence of archetypal symbols of renewal and rebirth, of growth and revitalization, of a future collective renaissance.
We might expect to see more dreams of empathetic reconnection with others, stimulating greater awareness of multiple perspectives on the world, breaking free from the solipsism of the digitized self to reconnect with other people, with nature, and with one’s own body.
We might expect to see more expressions of the archetype of the trickster, the playful agent of chaos and disorder who disrupts established traditions and yet also inspires new creativity and cultural dynamism.
We might see more forceful and perhaps even threatening appearances of the anima archetype, challenging narrowly androcentric thinking and stubbornly enduring patriarchal biases in all aspects of personal and collective life.
It seems a near-certainty that the apocalyptic anxieties of the present age are already calling forth unconscious responses of archetypal energy and symbolism in all of our lives. The big question is whether our conscious minds can recognize these archetypal expressions when they do occur, and integrate them into a broader, more balanced sense of self—a stronger self that can act more effectively in the world, fueled by the energy of psychological wholeness.
This is a review of the recently released film The Gulf of Silence, directed by M.K. Rhodes. It’s the tale of a fictional (?) professor who experiences something remarkable, suggesting the possibility of an alien intelligence visiting the Earth. Her life then goes completely to pieces until she winds up being recruited to come work for a “three-letter agency” deep within the black-budget world of the United States government, investigating the UFO phenomenon.
Considering the limitations of both budget and restrictions caused by the pandemic, both of which Rhodes told Hot Air were factors in how she was able to proceed, this is a truly remarkable film. Nearly the entire film is shot in the form of an interview with the professor, Dr. Laura Gale, in a variety of backgrounds. These segments are interspersed with wild and creative CGI imagery, historical footage and other imagery to flesh out the film. It’s visually a beautiful piece telling a highly intriguing story and the score is hauntingly beautiful.
Upon its release, the movie became the subject of considerable speculation in online forums, with some viewers seeing it as strictly a work of narrative fiction, while others claimed that it was a “documentary in disguise” revealing information about the United States government and UFOs. We asked Ms. Rhodes to clear that up for us. Here is her answer.
It is, in truth, both. The framework of the film is fiction, but it contains more hard facts than virtually any UFO documentary bar James Fox’s excellent “The Phenomenon”. This is less a reflection of my film’s truthfulness than it is a reflection on the average UFO documentary. In actuality, you cannot make a proper “documentary” about the UFO phenomenon because ultimately you are either making a documentary founded on, at best, speculation or hedged bets, or you are simply interviewing witnesses, and that is not a documentary about UFOs, that is simply a documentary about people who claim they have seen UFOs. A fictional framework allows me the luxury of speculating without the risk of being wrong and then having the film become dated; it also allows me to say things that the more neutral tone of something like “The Phenomenon” cannot.
Ms. Rhodes informed us that she’s long been a fan of the genre, describing herself as “a child of the X-Files,” and her love of the subject comes through clearly. The December 2017 release of that blockbuster New York Times article on AATIP was what prompted her to begin work on the project. I, for one, am very glad that she did.
The Gulf of Silence is now streaming on Amazon along with other platforms. Visit the film’s website for additional details.
Despite thoroughly enjoying this film from beginning to end, I vacillated a bit on a final rating because of the rather ambiguous nature of the presentation in terms of fact versus fantasy. But in the end, on the Hot Air scale for subscription-service films, The Gulf of Silence gets a 3.5:
4 – Subscribe to the service to watch this
3 – Make time to watch it if you already subscribe
2 – Worth a watch if nothing else appeals
1 – Avoid at all costs
The Gulf of Silence is rated TV-MA (18+) though I’m not entirely sure why. It’s not sexual in nature, nor does it contain much in the way of offensive language. I would say this movie is fine at least for older teens, though it deals with some complicated subjects, potential conspiracy theories, and other matters that may require a bit of explanation for younger viewers.
