Monday, 27 August 2012
Curiosity Rover Encounters Glowing Orb With Equal Curiosity, Aug 2012 NASA (Video)
By Scott Waring
Date of sighting: August 2012
Location of sighting: Gale Crater, Mars
Location of sighting: Gale Crater, Mars
Eyewitness
states:
This video was posted on the website of NASA www.nasa.gov. few minutes later was removed. In this video you can see an unidentified object in front of the lens going through "curiosity".
Look closely at this video and you will notice a glowing orb flashing over the horizon. It is coming toward the rover and then suddenly turns away as if to give it its space. This object has signs of intelligence with its maneuverability and its actions. Are we monitoring them or are they monitoring us? Life on Mars is not so unusual. NASA has taken steps to destroy Russian satellites that were suppose to explore mars, or so the Russian scientists state (which I have reported on in the past). Also Buzz Aldrin himself confirms there there is life on Mars moon Phobos, reason for the USA to attack Russian satellite.
This video was posted on the website of NASA www.nasa.gov. few minutes later was removed. In this video you can see an unidentified object in front of the lens going through "curiosity".
Look closely at this video and you will notice a glowing orb flashing over the horizon. It is coming toward the rover and then suddenly turns away as if to give it its space. This object has signs of intelligence with its maneuverability and its actions. Are we monitoring them or are they monitoring us? Life on Mars is not so unusual. NASA has taken steps to destroy Russian satellites that were suppose to explore mars, or so the Russian scientists state (which I have reported on in the past). Also Buzz Aldrin himself confirms there there is life on Mars moon Phobos, reason for the USA to attack Russian satellite.
UFOs over atomic plants – Part 1
The subject of UFOs spotted at missile bases and other sensitive nuclear facilities has received quite a bit of attention in recent years thanks to the great research of longtime ufologist Robert Hastings, author of the book UFOs and Nukes – Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites. Hastings was also the sponsor of a significant panel of former military witnesses of these incidents at the National Press Club (NPC) in Washington, DC on September 27, 2010. He wrote the cover story, “UFO/Nuclear Connection,” for Open Minds magazine issue 7 (April/May 2011), where he discussed the media impact of his NPC event.
Long before all this I had treaded some of the same territory for a three-part series I wrote in early 1982, under the pseudonym of A. Hovni, for the supplement UFOs and other Cosmic Phenomena, published weekly by the longtime defunct New York City newspaper The News World. I did extensive research on the declassified UFO files of the CIA, FBI, USAF, U.S. Army and Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which had then been recently released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The files clearly showed that the military and intelligence agencies were quite worried during the early period of the flying saucer era in the late forties and early fifties by the large amount of UFO sightings over sensitive nuclear facilities. Many resulted in the scramble of fighter planes. This was the height of the Cold War and a climate of “red menace” paranoia was rampant in at least parts of the U.S. government. Many of the UFO-nuke documents come under the heading of “Protection of Vital Installations.”
I have transcribed the article exactly as it was published back in February of 1982, except for the correction of a few typos. However, I’ve added at the end some of the official documents mentioned in the original story, so you can read the full document and not just the quotes excerpted in the article.
* * *
The News World, New York City, February 20, 1982
UFO surveillance of A-plants
U.S. documents show atomic link to saucers
By A. Hovni
Special to The News World
First in a three-part series
We often hear the statement that UFOs, whatever they are, have a tendency to buzz atomic plants and other similarly sensitive military and industrial installations. This is naturally used to support the theory that UFOs are extraterrestrial devices which understandably are engaged in a systematic surveillance of the Earth’s military and industrial resources. And yes indeed, there is enough evidence to verify the assertion that UFOs do fly over atomic plants.
This is not based on hearsay or unconfirmed press accounts, but rather on dozens of declassified U.S. government documents from agencies such as the CIA, the FBI, the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Army, and last but not least, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). These documents have been obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by Dr. Bruce Maccabee, now with the Fund for UFO Research, and New York City attorney Peter Gersten, for Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) and Ground Saucer Watch (GSW). But let’s plunge into the evidence.
UFOs—an energy link noted.
Because the flying saucer phenomenon followed closely the growing development of atomic energy, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that both subjects became mixed up in more than one opportunity. Take, for instance, a July 18, 1947 FBI memorandum concerning the opinions of an informant, a nuclear scientist from Stamford, Connecticut, about “flying saucers.” The memo’s sub-headline reads “Atomic Energy Act,” and the scientist (name deleted) had worked at the MIT’s Radiation Laboratory during the Manhattan project, and was employed at the time the memo was written with the American Cyanamid Research Laboratory in Stamford.
He told an FBI agent in New Haven that, “it is quite possible hat actually the ‘flying saucers’ could be radio controlled germ bombs or atom bombs which are circling the orbit of the earth and which could be controlled by radio and directed to land on any designated target at the specific desire of the agency or country operating the bombs.”
The possibility that UFOs were really “nuclear-propelled missiles” was discussed in another lengthy FBI memo, dated January 10, 1949. An FBI agent in Knoxville, Tenn. had received a “voluntary” visit by a Mr. Roterman, who was “the principal army technician at the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft Research Center at Oak Ridge, Tennessee,” according to the document. Flying saucers had already been sighted and reported at Oak Ridge itself, and a concentrated flap would follow in 1950, as we shall see in our next article.
In any event, it was Roterman’s personal opinion that “there is only one possible fuel which could be utilized (in UFOs) which is in accord with present theory, and that is the utilization of atomic energy.” To support his theory, Roterman “called attention to the vapor trail and gaseous corona described as a ball of fire, which he states might give some evidence to the fact that a radioactive field is present.”
When the Central Intelligence Agency became seriously involved in the flying saucer situation during the early ’50s, they seemed to be much more cautious about confusing saucers with missiles, although they certainly did notice and research a link between UFOs and atomic energy. For example, a CIA document based on a briefing with the Air Force, dated August 22, 1952, states that “a study of ‘flying saucer’ sightings on a geographical basis showed them to be more frequent in the vicinity of atomic energy installations,” to which the CIA added in parenthesis, that this could be “explained by the greater security consciousness of persons in those areas.” Yet the fact remains undisputed that before 1953, when President Eisenhower launched his famous “Atoms for Peace” campaign, UFOs had been spotted frequently over all of America’s top nuclear research facilities, including the restricted areas around Los Alamos and Sandia Base in New Mexico, the Hanford AEC plants and waste disposal sites in Washington State, the Oak Ridge nuclear facilities in Tennessee, and the Savannah River Plant in South Carolina.
This would lead some “CIA consultants” to state that the solution of the UFO conundrum “would probably be found on the margins or just beyond the frontiers of our present knowledge in the fields of atmospheric, ionospheric, and extraterrestrial phenomena, with the added possibility that the present dispersal of nuclear waste products might also be a factor.”
Understandably, the CIA would elaborate further on this possibility, which is mentioned in several documents, memoranda and position papers from the time. Speculating that “UFOs may be electromagnetic or electrostatic in character,” one of the documents from the summer of ’52 added that, “effects of interaction between these natural phenomena and radioactive material in the air can only be conjectured.” It gave as possible evidence the fact that UFO sightings had been reported at Los Alamos and Oak Ridge, “at a time when the background radiation count had risen inexplicably.” But convenient as this explanation seemed, the CIA was nevertheless cautious to conclude that “here we run out of even ‘blue yonder’ explanations that might be tenable, and we still are left with numbers of incredible reports from credible observers.”
With Headquarters in Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, Texas, the Fourth Army was responsible during the early post-World War II era with the protection of Los Alamos and Sandia Base in New Mexico, and Camp Hood in Texas. All these restricted areas were the subject of numerous unexplained sightings between 1948 and 1950. One Fourth Army document, dated July 2, 1949, gives a complete “Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena, Camp Hood, Texas,” indicating that “over 100 men and officers have observed and reported the phenomena.” Termed “fireballs” for lack of a better name, some objects were described “round” and others with “diamond or oblong shape.” Beginning on March 6, 1949, the phenomenon was said to appear at Camp Hood “on the average of every nine days,” and it was determined that no conventional aircraft had been flying at the time.
Other documents show that similar fireballs “of an intense white or greenish white” had been observed several times by “security inspectors at Los Alamos AEC project,” as well as by sentries at Sandia Base and Kirtland Field. Furthermore, meteorologist and astronomer Dr. Lincoln La Paz, from the University of New Mexico, was pproached by the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) to cooperate in the ongoing investigation. One of the Fourth Army documents states that “Dr. La Paz has, from descriptions of observations furnished him and, BY PERSONAL OBSERVATION, determined that the objects sighted are NOT natural meteoric phenomena.” (Capital letters and emphasis in the original).
The FBI also became aware of the problem, as we can see from a memo written on January 31, 1949 by the Special Agent in Charge (SAC) in San Antonio to Director J. Edgar Hoover, summarizing the series of sightings “toward the apparent ‘target’, namely, Los Alamos.” Besides repeating both the sightings and hypothesis mentioned already, the memo cites a letter by a woman whose name has been deleted. Although the agent says “she has generally been considered unreliable and possibly mentally unbalanced”—presumably deduced from her numerous letters “to Military Authorities concerning her theories regarding Atomic Energy”—nevertheless he added that “she, however, has submitted to Military Authorities the only theory thus far known that has any credibility at all, namely, that the lights are manifestations of cosmic rays which are directed toward a specific point. She further theorizes that such rays may interfere with the ignition of motors and may account for various unexplained air crashes.”
In his classic book, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, the late former Project Bluebook Head, Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, revealed that at one point the government was so concerned with the fireballs around Los Alamos that a high level scientific conference was called in. Dr. Edward Teller, the father of the H bomb, Dr. Lincoln La Paz, and other luminaries were among the participants. Eventually the Air Force established Project Twinkle, under Dr. La Paz, to study, photograph and measure the phenomenon with three “cinetheodolite stations” near White Sands, New Mexico. It is generally recognized, however, that by the time Project Twinkle finally became operational, the concentration of fireballs had also began to die out, so that no significant data was obtained. Yet the presence of “flying discs” around vital atomic plants was by no means over. (See the enclosed letter from USAF Lt. Col. Doyle Rees to the Director of AFOSI in Washington, Brig. Gen. Joseph Carroll, covering the entire fireball issue. The document was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and disseminated by attorney Peter Gersten).
Sample Official Documents
July 13, 1947 FBI memo, re. “Atomic Energy Act,” with information provided by an informant who was a nuclear scientist at the American Cyanamid Research Labs in Connecticut.
USAF Briefing to the CIA, dated Aug. 22, 1952, with quote (point IV) about “flying saucer sightings . . . in the vicinity of atomic energy installations.”
Confidential report from Los Alamos, dated Dec. 13, 1948, regarding Dr. Lincoln La Paz’s own sighting of a fireball.
December 1948 document from Headquarters Fourth Army in Fort Sam Houston, Texas, re. “Unidentified Flying Objects New Mexico,” summarizing the investigation of the so-called green fireballs seen in Los Alamos and other sensitive locations.
July 2, 1949 “Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena” from the G-2 Headquarters of the Fourth Army in Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
May 25, 1950 comprehensive report from Lt. Col. Doyle Rees, AFOSI’s District Commander, to his boss, Brig. Gen. Joseph F. Carroll, USAF Director of Special Investigations, re., “Summary of Observations of Aerial Phenomena in the New Mexico Area, Dec. 1948 – May 1950.”
Roswell? No. Close? Maybe…
By Nick Redfern
Whenever anyone wants to talk about a reported UFO crash outside of the United States, it always seems to be touted as the “British Roswell,” the “Canadian Roswell,” the “Australian Roswell,” the…well, you get it, right? Yes, I know that whatever happened outside of Roswell, New Mexico in the summer of 1947, it was an event of deep significance. I know! I really do! But, can we please stop with the Roswell comparisons just once in a while when discussing other alleged UFO crash cases?
I hope so, since I have one to tell you about that very few will have any awareness of. Yes, it’s intriguing and notable. Yes, it caught the attention of the U.S. military. But let’s not get over-excited and loudly proclaim it as the next Roswell, just because that’s what is usually expected. And with that said, here’s the story…
A multi-page document, prepared by the 468th Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) detachment of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), describes an intriguing event that occurred in the River Lagarfljot, Iceland in August 1954. The paperwork in question, declassified under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, and available for scrutiny at the National Archives, tells a notable story.
According to the Air Force’s files, shortly before 9.00 p.m. on the night of August 24, 1954, a fast-moving, low-flying, dark-gray colored and cylindrical-shaped UFO was seen in the vicinity of Egilsstadir by an individual at Hjardabol, a farm located near the junction of the Lagarfljot and Jokula Rivers, in North-eastern Iceland. The event would probably have been dismissed, for lack of evidence, particularly since it took the witness a full week to summon up the courage to tell the authorities, were it not for one startling aspect of the story.
The man in question, a farmer whose name is excised from the files, told the Air Force that as he watched the unknown craft on its flight-path, it suddenly lost speed and slammed into, and violently bounced across, a sand-bar on the Lagarfljot River, and quickly sank into the water. Evidence of nothing less than a crashed UFO might just be waiting to be uncovered, excited Air Force personnel could not fail to note.
Evidently impressed by the words of the farmer a detachment of Icelandic and U.S. military personnel hastily set off from Reykjavik to the scene of all the potential alien action. And given what was potentially at stake – the possible recovery of a craft from another world – the search was meticulous in the extreme. It was September 11, 1954 when the team finally reached the exact point of impact, but, unfortunately, as the Air Force noted: “Between the time of the sighting, the Lagarfljot River had risen twice and washed over the sand-bar where the object reportedly landed, altering the size and shape of the sand-bar.”
The military was far from dissuaded from pressing on, however. Upon satisfying themselves that they had reached the right spot, the Icelandic/American team brought in a trio of mine-detectors in an effort to determine if they might assist in locating the object, or perhaps priceless fragments of it. It was an action that ended in failure, much to the deep frustration of all involved. But they were not quite done yet. Local divers were even enlisted – and sworn to secrecy in the process – to search for the device on the riverbed, but they too came up empty-handed.
There were two possibilities, the Air Force concluded: the UFO had not sunk to the bottom of the river, but had got swept along by the running waters and was now much further away than suspected, or it was deeply buried in the bed of the river, something that would require considerable equipment to locate and recover it.
Interestingly, while Air Force files exist, and have also been declassified into the public domain, showing that plans were initiated to carefully and completely search the entire river-bed with sophisticated equipment, including portable cranes from Reykjavik, the files revealing the outcome of this action, rather predictably, have yet to see the light of day.
Perhaps Icelandic and American military personnel really did secretly recover a ship from another galaxy back in 1954. Or, even more amazing and thought-provoking, perhaps it still remains buried, somewhere deep in the mud of the Lagarfljot River. Not quite Roswell. But, perhaps, worth another look around the area in question, even after all these years…